Considering all the occurrences over the past four years, I’m confused how anybody would be supportive of another four years of Obama. That goes double for us ATV riders:
Obama’s ‘Abusive’ EPA Edict Targets Bikers, ATV Aficianados & Gardeners Too
>>> In short, Obama seeks to have the EPA regulate us into bicyclists, while conveniently avoiding an embarrassing unwarranted ban attempt in the halls of Congress. You know, similar to how “Fast & Furious” was to justify a new round of gun bans.
But back to the Libya here… The bigger question is “Why”. Why is Obama so mealy-mouthed for over two weeks about calling an act of Terrorism – “Terrorism”, when we now know emails sent to White House staffers within hours of the incident clearly identified the incident as such? Why was it that four days after the Rose Garden speech which supposedly proved Obama blameless was Obama addressing the General Assembly of the UN talking about a YouTube video? Why did conservative news groups have to file freedom of Information Act requests to see what the WH staff were privately discussing immediately after the attack? And … has anybody here heard any viable explanation on how the President of the United States could be so vehemently misinformed as to blame all this on a YouTube Video?!?!
When looked at objectively, the answer is fairly simple. Al-Qaida was supposed to have died when Bin laden was killed. Or at least that’s the President’s position. That Obama defeated Al-Qaida by killing one man, and the American People would forever rejoice and reelect their leader who put “Al-Qaida On Its Heels”(Obama quote). Only… like so many of Obama’s plans - It didn’t work out that way. So when Al-Qaida struck again after Bin Laden’s death, this story was crafted to cover up the fact that in actuality, Obama has done very little against Al-Qaida. Oh sure, he got Bin Laden (Who wouldn’t of acted on that intelligence?) but as they just proved on 9/11/12 – they are far from being on their heels.
So, Whether Obama genuinely believes that he is responsible for neutralizing Al-Qaida or just trying to convince enough voters for a long enough period of time to get him his second term is irrelevant. What is relevant is that Al-Qaida has NOT received the memo that they are impotent or incapable, and are not even being credited with the terrorism they are producing. If I were them, the next obvious step would be to… Brew up a scenario that can’t be blamed on YouTube.