Can-Am ATV Forum banner

What's the point in higher CC engines on can am outlander?

2 reading
335 views 23 replies 10 participants last post by  Ruthless01  
#1 ·
I have a 2007 can am outlander 650 max which maxes out around 68 mph. I bought a broken 2007 800 that I am almost done fixing but I heard it pretty much has the same speeds and same with the 1000cc. If the speed is the same, and I doubt very many people are hauling big trailers with these, what is the point in higher cc engines? Just to burn more fuel? Lol let me know because I am genuinely curious. I do know that obviously the 800 and 1000cc's could be faster if there was no speed limiter but I am obviously not going to mess with that as its there for a reason, to not wear your engine out. But seriously if they all go around the same top speed I don't see the point?
 
#2 ·
Get on one and find out. Seriously though they get there a lot faster and have a lot of punch. Usually they are a bit faster top end as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10mm_
#4 ·
It's not about top speed, it's about how fast you get there if desired. It's also about having the extra power with just a punch of the throttle when needed. Some people buy a 1000 and never get close to utilizing all the power they have available, some folks like me would never consider buying anything less than a 1000 because I love having it when I want it.

Newer ones also limited at higher than 68 also depending on the model. Think my XTP was set to 76 when purchased and my wife's 850 XMR is 65.
 
#12 ·
Well I guess I'm just the type to not care how fast it can get up to speed, I just think its dangerous seen too many people speed up and hit a tree or something, I aint gonna be one of them but thanks for the exclamation, also does higher CC engines use more gas when running at the same speeds? For example, a 650cc driving at 40 miles an hour vs a 1000cc running a 40 miles an hour?
 
#14 ·
If you do 2 up riding, the more torque the better. I have a 2006 max 400 and 2011 max 500 and it is nice the little extra power for the added weight. I had a 2013 650 xt for a summer and I think the 650 was a sweet spot for power. I haven't tried a 570 so that might be a good all around power option for 80% of riders.
 
#15 ·
more torque for plowing,getting out of mudholes,getting anywhere faster,towing anything,bigger tires without a clutch job,there is no downside to higher hp/torque.I'm seriously considering trading in for the new outlander xt-p to match my commander,but the wife had put her foot down on that idea for now.she is planning a month long trip to Italy so no more toys for a while.