I have a 2007 can am outlander 650 max which maxes out around 68 mph. I bought a broken 2007 800 that I am almost done fixing but I heard it pretty much has the same speeds and same with the 1000cc. If the speed is the same, and I doubt very many people are hauling big trailers with these, what is the point in higher cc engines? Just to burn more fuel? Lol let me know because I am genuinely curious. I do know that obviously the 800 and 1000cc's could be faster if there was no speed limiter but I am obviously not going to mess with that as its there for a reason, to not wear your engine out. But seriously if they all go around the same top speed I don't see the point?
What's the point in higher CC engines on can am outlander?
Ruthless01
21 - 29 of 29 Posts
Yes single cylinder.
BRP has put a very good tune in the 450 already. If I wanted more I would trade for a new 700.
Joined
·
34 Posts
Oh right i forgot newer can ams have single cylinder 700s. So if they have single 700 pistons wouldny it be possible to put 2 700 cylinders and pistons on a vtwin for 1400cc? Everyone seems to want more power but i dont see anyone making more than 1000cc engines
Joined
·
26 Posts
Now you talking
1400cc and a Turbo on E85 I could go for that.
Joined
·
34 Posts
It would be interesting if someone tried this, why doesnt can am already do that?
So per your post 68mph tops, my 850 tops out at 78 mph, so there that and that Picture of said top speed is floating around the forum somewhere.
Rotax makes a 1630cc engine, 300hp
Joined
·
34 Posts
Yeah people already said that, some of the atvs are capped at 78 from factory some at 68, could get it coded. Just more ways for bombardier to make money 🤷‍♂️
Joined
·
26 Posts
Now why is that not in a ATV?
Joined
·
26 Posts
I have saw videos of a Renegade 1000 XMR and it toped out at 65 mph.
My TURBO Sportsman XP1000 would go about 100 mph because of the Dynojet Power Vision 3 can eliminate the top speed and RPM rev limiter but that would with the standard Sportsman XP1000 gears I have Highlifter gear reduction so it would top out about
80 mph and this is only a guess because I only been over 70 and it still had more to go.
I thought about putting the standard gearing back in and would most likely be better for DragRacing because it would be more efficient
but gear reduction is better for trail riding.
21 - 29 of 29 Posts
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
